Senior CNN Executive Admits News Media Distorted Afghanistan War

>>> Rena Golden, the executive vice-president and general manager of CNN International, comments on the war against Afghanistan:

Anyone who claims the US media didn’t censor itself is kidding you. It wasn’t a matter of government pressure but a reluctance to criticize anything in a war that was obviously supported by the vast majority of the people.

And this isn’t just a CNN issue--every journalist who was in any way involved in 9/11 is partly responsible.

The comment was made at Newsworld Asia, a conference for news executives, held in Singapore on 30 July-2 August 2002. Read the entire conference report.

 

Some other quotes from the Newsworld Asia conference:

Keynote speaker Martin Hadlow, director of the UNESCO office in Kabul, described how difficult it was to persuade journalists to cover good news stories in any depth.

“Reporters are interested in the extremes – the doom and gloom of war on one hand, and surfing goat stories on the other. Nothing much in between gets any consideration.” There was little interest, he said, when he suggested a story about women teachers – regularly beaten up by the Taliban when caught teaching at home – who were now working for no pay to bring two million children back into full time education.

....

Carmen Pedrosa, the veteran Philippines columnist, was fatalistic. “You have to accept that American influence is so strong in my country and stories involving the US are given much greater prominence than anything else – the government has been very critical of journalists who didn’t give their full support to the war against terrorism, for instance.”

....

There was also concern that new technologies which were supposed to make life easier for journalists and allow them by-pass military obstruction were less than helpful. A letter from a reporter who covered the crisis said: “More time was spent in hotel rooms servicing and fixing some of the gear than was spent on the road doing the job. The technology wins, but the journalism loses.”

....

Simon Dring, MD of Ekushey TV in Bangladesh, observed: “There were 3,500 reporters in Afghanistan – many of them freelances pushing harder than they should for a story. Where was their safety training? Were they properly insured? Absolutely not.”

Those people became a danger to more seasoned professionals, said CNN New Delhi bureau chief Satinder Bindra. “One of many totally untrained journalists I encountered was determined to get closer to the front – close enough to see the Taliban front line. I told him that if we could see the Taliban, they could see us, and they’d shoot – for what purpose? There was no story, no good picture, but because this guy wanted to make a name for himself we all had to follow, just in case.

“Until every single journalist working in war zones has proper hostile environment training, such things will keep happening.”

Dring added that journalists should also be aware of how they behave. An Italian woman journalist was shot dead by Taliban fighters, he said, after getting out of a car wearing no head cover, in skin tight jeans, smoking a cigarette on a Friday - the holiest day of the week.

And Kain, whose company is one of the world’s leading hostile environment training outfits, asked delegates not to forget the people without whom journalists can’t operate in war zones. “The reporter might be able to get away with all sorts of things, but what about his driver, his local fixer and their families? We have a collective responsibility to ensure that those people aren’t exposed to dangers we can walk away from, but they can’t.”

[read the entire conference report]

 

front page | newest additions | index + search
about | contact | donate

copyright 2002 Russ Kick