Accidents
Involving Nukes:
Official List from the UK Ministry of Defence
|
Click
here for the document Left-click
to open the file |
|
>>> It took six years, but the London Guardian has forced the Ministry of Defence to hand over a list of 20 nuclear accidents from 1960 to 1991. Reporter Rob Evans kindly supplied The Memory Hole with the actual document, which is not otherwise online. He wrote the following story based on this hard-won information:
In July 2001, Evans wrote this article, which gives some background on the freedom of information struggle. Three weeks after handing over the above list, the MoD was again pressured by the Guardian into releasing more information, this time regarding nuclear weapons aboard UK warships during the Falkland Islands war. The resulting article by Evans: Falklands Warships Carried Nuclear Weapons, MoD Admits. This follow-up article looks at the fallout from the revelation. The Falklands document is reproduced below and is available as a Word document here. |
| From: Stan
Cameron Directorate of Safety, Environment and Fire Policy Assistant Director Nuclear Accident Response Room 123A, DCMC, Main Building, Whitehall, London SW1A 2HB Telephone:020 72188424 Military: 9621 88424 Fax: 020 72188830 Fax: 9621 88830 www: dsefpol-adnar@defence.mod.uk Mr Rob Evans Reporter Newsroom The Guardian 119 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3ER Reference: D SEF POL/33/3 Date: 5 December 2003
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPON ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS Thank you for your letter of 23 October pursuing your request for information about one of the incidents referred to in the Oxburgh report. This was included as Serial 13 of Section 2 of the revised table supplied with our letter to you of 3 October which the Ombudsman regarded as a satisfactory outcome to your complaint about the level of information we had previously been willing to provide on incidents referred to by Oxburgh. As explained in our response to the Ombudsman, we continue to operate a policy that we Neither Confirm Nor Deny the presence of nuclear weapons at any particular location or time. Within these limitations we can, however, provide some additional information, including explaining the broad context, which will, I hope, be helpful. The Oxburgh report notes that seven nuclear weapons containers received some external damage in the course of ship to ship transfers during the Falklands campaign. The weapons transferred were nuclear depth charges (and inert training and surveillance variants). It was normal practice at the time for certain surface ships to carry such weapons, although it was made clear at the time that "there is no question at all of our using nuclear weapons in this dispute" (Official Report, House of Lords, 27 April 1982, Volume 429, Column 778). The transfers took place well away from other sea going traffic, and the weapons were held in ships with the best protected magazines before being returned to the UK. These activities were also consistent with our obligations under the Treaty of Tlatelolco (Latin American Nuclear Free Zone). Various transfers took place in April, May and June 1982 but available records do not show which of these gave rise to damage to the containers. We know that no weapons were damaged but, with one exception, available records provide little additional information about the damage to containers (or whether they contained actual weapons or inert variants). In what was considered the worst case, a container sustained severe distortion to a door housing. Our records show that there was no damage to its contents (an inert surveillance variant). This suggests that the damage to other containers was slight. All were subsequently examined and found to be safe and serviceable. You also sought additional information about the subsequent recommendations made by CINCFLEET. These were essentially modifications to detailed handling procedures. As you will be aware, the Royal Navy's surface ships ceased to carry nuclear weapons in the early 1990s and the records which are still available do not show how these recommendations were implemented. Yours sincerely, [signed] Stan Cameron Stan Cameron |
|
front
page |
newest additions | index
+ search |
| posted 17 Dec 2003 | copyright 2002-3 Russ Kick |